Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Goldie Peacock (they/them)'s avatar

Thanks for writing about your experience, Natalie. I love learning how others navigate the question of to MFA or not to MFA. Over the past few years I've embarked on a DIY MFA of sorts, and it's been amazing. I've attended dozens of literary events and workshops, read hundreds of books, published dozens of pieces, and written thousands of pages, all without debt and mostly without leaving my home. Instead of being relegated to particular professors or peers, I take workshops with writers I admire and meet so many cool people along the way. I'm with you on the point about community involvement—those connections are wonderful, and while an MFA cohort can be hit or miss with them, there's a whole wide world of writers beyond those programs. If I were to find a magical unicorn of a program out there, sure, I'd consider pursuing an actual MFA, but plenty of writers have done just fine without (including everyone pre-1936).

Expand full comment
Bruce Parker's avatar

That said, who gets published? Who wins contests? People with MFAs get awards and published in more "top tier" lit mags than those without. If your goal is to become a better poet, the University of DIY is fine, it has worked for me much along the lines Natalie lays out. If your goal is to teach, probably in an MFA program, you need an MFA and can live with the salary you're likely to earn. Community is not a tangible reward, but whichever route you take, it is the best reward.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts