Welcome to our weekly column offering perspectives on lit mag publishing, with contributions from readers, writers and editors around the world.
I was thrilled when I got the call. A local writer’s group after receiving a draft of a short story I’d written extended an invitation for me to join their circle. I showed up at the appropriate time and place and was warmly welcomed.
As time went on, I came to value this group as an integral part of my growth as a budding new writer. Their critiques of my submissions were kind and often more gracious than they probably deserved. In turn, I did my best to critique the work of the others as honestly and fairly as I could.
There was one writer in our group who wrote exclusively in the genre of flash fiction. Jenny was brilliant. Her ability to write a complete story in less than five-hundred words astounded us all. Often hilariously funny, at times shockingly insightful, and always intelligently poignant. I think I can safely say that we were all impressed, and a bit threatened by her writing prowess.
Our group meets once a month. The deadline for submissions is one week before our upcoming meeting. I received via email, our usual method of exchanging our submissions, another outstanding flash fiction piece from Jenny. It was short. 203 words, to be exact. As always, I was very impressed. Although there were a few lines that somehow seemed familiar. Especially her masterful final paragraph: “People take different roads seeking fulfillment and happiness. Just because they’re not on your road doesn’t mean they’ve gotten lost.”
Out of curiosity, I cut and pasted the sentence into my browser and hit ‘enter.’ For a moment I was in denial. Denial eventually subsided into disappointed, which soon became sadness and ultimately that feeling of being completely duped. I entered another sentence, then another. Of the 203 words in Jenny’s flash fiction story 106 were not her words at all. The profound last sentence belongs to the Dali Lama. Others to lesser known, but nevertheless, others.
Denial eventually subsided into disappointed, which soon became sadness and ultimately that feeling of being completely duped.
I opened my writer’s group file and retrieved previous submissions from Jenny. I cut and pasted the most breathtaking sentences of Jenny’s submissions and subjected them to the Google gods. Almost every story had been plagiarized to one degree or another.
The following Wednesday I arrived at our writer’s group and offered little in the way of feedback on the piece Jenny had submitted. I listened as the six other members verbalized their praise and admiration for her piece. One of our group members shared of a conversation she’d had with a friend earlier that day which was difficult. She said, “Jenny, I wish I could think the way you write. That last sentence about being on different roads not meaning I’ve gotten lost. Those were the exact words I needed for my friend. You are a genius.” Jenny bowed her head in a guise of humility and simply responded, “Thank you.”
Perhaps I should have confronted her there and then, but I have always believed that if you are going to confront someone about and issue that will bring much shame upon them, it should never be in front of a group. I’m also uncomfortable with confrontation. So, perhaps that’s the real reason I chose what I believed was the higher road. When I returned home that evening, I spent many hours formulating an email to Jenny. I allowed it to sit and percolate for a few days before hitting ‘send’. It addressed, what I had discovered and specifically the fact that plagiarism is the blasphemy of the writing world. I offered to meet with her to discuss the issue and offered my support as she came clean to the rest of our writer’s group as well as the many magazines she had submitted her work to.
The reply I got back was scathing. She was infuriated that I would accuse her of such a thing. “Everything I have ever written is my own work. I would never do what you have accused me of doing.” she wrote. She turned the table and threatened me, then pleaded with me, then her anger raged again. All the eloquence of her usual writing was as absent as she was the next time our group met.
I have not seen her again. She simply disappeared from the writing community.
The writing world is small. It’s okay to make mistakes. We often learn best that way. But there are some things which are sacred. As writers all we have is our word, or words, as the case maybe. When the reader cannot believe the things we write, we have nothing.
I feel for the Jenny’s in the writing community; those who have some degree of talent but have such poor self-worth that they are willing to jeopardize everything for the praise of a few. Plagiarism has never been easier. Nor has it ever been easier to detect.
Beware. Be honest. Be yourself.
This article appeared originally in Authors Publish Magazine.
We still have no appreciation for the fact that 5-10% of the population has a significant personality disorder, whether APD, BPD, or NPD, and the implications for that any time groups of people gather, and the way that magnifies when we gather online, both because of scale and because most of the cues are masked, and it can be difficult to spot int he first place. Our default assumption is that those we're interacting with are running on a typical operating system, but in any group of 10-20 people, odds are that someone is not.
Most social media outrages are instigated by people with APD or BPD, stirring up drama for the fun of it. And most plagiarists have NPD, which is really the manifestation of a complete and irreparable absence of self-esteem. Unfortunately, there's nothing to really do about it -- no treatments work, and they'll never realize that they have an illness driving them to exploit others. All we can do is notice, call it out, and force them to move on to some other set of hosts to parasitize, which is almost certainly what Jennifer did. She's probably sharing stories weekly in another group right now.
In the early aughts there was a writer I knew on Zoetrope whose prize-winning story was stolen by a student at famous University studying under one of the most famous writers in the world. Famous U closed ranks despite the obvious evidence. The victim was treated like and painted as a crank. Cancel culture has taken a sharp turn since then, and perhaps has gone too far, and I'd rather see someone steal from the Dali Lama than a struggling writer. But the disposition shouldn't depend on with whom the thief is connected! Schools and the literary community need to instill and enforce a better attitude toward creativity, collaboration, fellowship, and ethics.