Discussion about this post

User's avatar
River's avatar

I'm genuinely confused as to why genocide is not the bottom, unencroachable line for people. The UN<---The UN itself has use the word extermination in regards to palestinians.

Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt (@FranceskAlbs) writes:

"Reading the health experts, I am starting to think with horror that if it's not stopped, Israel's assault could end up exterminating almost the entire population in Gaza over the next couple of years.

The range of presumable direct and indirect deaths could be between 15 and 20% of the population already by the end of this year, according to Prof. @devisridhar

(and that's in line with the work of other academics).

Once the dust settles, I can't imagine how the world will go on after having allowed that.

Again."

How this can continue to be a "but two sides" and "liberal freedom" "what about our festivals" debate is astounding. Imagine this same conversation happening around Nazi Germany - because make no mistake this is indeed a holocaust - in the 1930's.

Its frustrating to watch certain literary players conflate being anti-genocide/apartheid with being against all Jewish people. The boycott is for those who are zionist/supporting what is going on in Israel - which is plainly and clearly genocide heaped on top of apartheid. It becomes even more clear when those voices try to frame resisters as "a small minority of anti-zionists" so they can continue to paint resistance against genocide as inherently anti-semitic, which make no mistake its anti-semitic in and of itself to say Jewish identity must inherently be wrapped into zionism at all, much less as such a cost.

This is a tragedy in the soul of the literary community that the lives of millions at the hands of a warring state is pitted against writing communities who continue to support or refuse to resist genocide, as if these things are equal in any way.

Expand full comment
Nona Lea's avatar

Everyone: the selection of Zionists voices only is purposeful. They are slanting it like Fox news to elicit a certain reaction and manipulate the audience. Otherwise, they would have included voices of the boycott movement of ISRAELI institutions (not Jewish ones!). It’s clear they are pro-Zionist at this point.

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts